Monday, September 21, 2015
Financial market snapshot September
Why are financial markets so scared about a quarter percentage point increase of the Federal Funds Rate? Because the hikes would not stop at + 0.25, but mark the beginning of new cycle of rising interest rates that may reach three or four percent just as its "normal" level. However, as there has been an overshooting downwards, there will also be an overshooting on the way up. When will the Federal Funds Rate reach five or six percent or even more? That is the question that troubles the markets. Financial market operates are scared because an interest rate back to normality of 3 to 4 percent would already imply an asset price contraction of 75 percent.
Financial Market Snapshot August
Why are global markets so scared about China? It is not
economic growth per se that’s causing the fear but the risk
that an enduring economic weakness of the Chinese
economy could provoke the repatriation of asset from
abroad, particularly a reduction of the Chinese holdings of
US treasuries.
Any significant shift towards less dollar asset accumulation
would provoke higher US interest rates irrespective of any
FED actions. A surge of interest rates provoked by
Chinese asset reallocation has global implications.
Such a change would not only be poison for the US bond
and stock market, it could mark its arrow of death for US
financial assets and a global meltdown.
economic growth per se that’s causing the fear but the risk
that an enduring economic weakness of the Chinese
economy could provoke the repatriation of asset from
abroad, particularly a reduction of the Chinese holdings of
US treasuries.
Any significant shift towards less dollar asset accumulation
would provoke higher US interest rates irrespective of any
FED actions. A surge of interest rates provoked by
Chinese asset reallocation has global implications.
Such a change would not only be poison for the US bond
and stock market, it could mark its arrow of death for US
financial assets and a global meltdown.
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
Financial market snapshot April 2015
THE CONTINENTAL
ECONOMICS INSTITUTE
FINANCIAL MARKET
SNAPSHOT APRIL 2015
Growth
While Japan
is still struggling, the other major economies and regions are in full recovery
with the United States and the United Kingdom well ahead with growth rates of
over two per cent in 2014. Over the past five quarters, the G20 has attained good
growth rates in the range between 3.3 and 3.7 per cent. These rates are not
exceedingly high and point to solid recovery so far. Even the Euro Zone with
its host of countries suffering from debt problems managed to remain in
positive territory with its growth since the end of 2013. Germany had a strong
first quarter in 2014 that did not continue but the economic growth rate held
above one per cent.
It is obvious
that some part of this growth performance is the result of the immense monetary
stimuli, which all major central banks have been applying over the past couple
of years. There are signals that the American central bank will raise interest
rates in the middle of this year and it remains to be seen whether growth is
already robust enough to withstand such a rise.
Industrial
production is relatively strong in the U.S. and Germany yet highly uneven in
Japan. While the rates for the growth of industrial production have been
steadily rising in the U.S., they have shown a falling trend in Germany, while in
Japan the rate, which stood at 7.6 per cent in the first quarter of 2013, has
shown negative rates in the second and third quarter of 2014.
Industrial
production has been relatively strong in the United States where it rose from
3.3 per cent by the end of 2013 to 4.6 per cent in the second quarter and to
4.5 per cent in the third quarter of 2014. The other major industrial
countries, however, continue showing a relatively poor performance.
Current Account
As in the
years before, the current account deficit of the United States remained negative and even deteriorated
somewhat from 1.8 per cent in the first quarter of 2014 to 2.7 percent in the
third quarter of 2014. The Euro Zone maintained its solid surplus over the past
quarters in the a range of 2.1 per cent to 3.5 per cent with Germany having
extremely high surpluses of over eight per cent at the end of 2013 and only
slightly lower surpluses of 6.8 and 6.4 in the first and second quarter of
2014. The United Kingdom could lower its deficit from 2013 to 2014 yet remains
at a high level of 5.3 per cent in the fourth and 3.6 per cent in the first
semester of 2014. Japan is about to maintain a balance current account on
average that oscillated between a deficit of 1.2 per cent in the fourth quarter
of 2013 to a surplus of 1.3 per cent in the third quarter of 2014. The same
tendency as in Japan holds for China which is about to steadily reduce its
surplus which stood at 0.3 per cent in the first quarter of 2014. Germany
continues registering excessively high current account surpluses of over six
percent in the first two quarters of 2014.
Interest
rates
There has
been little change regarding interest rates. In all major economic areas, the
rate is below 0.5 per cent. The Libor dollar rate fell to a historical low of
0.35 per cent in December 2013 as it happened likewise with the Libor euro
rate. Only the Libor rate for the yen rose slightly to 0.35 per cent.
Exchange
rate
The dollar
got stronger not only against the Brazilian real but also to the Euro, the
Pound Sterling and other currencies. The dollar/euro rate fell from 1.36 in
January 2014 to 1.23 in January 2015. In the same period, the dollar/pound
sterling rate fell from 1.65 to 1.51. The Yen held relatively steady as 103.94 had
to be paid for one dollar in January 2014 and 111.31 yen in January 2015. The
value of the Brazilian real began to weaken from 2.38 Real per U.S. dollar in
January 2014 to 2.63 real in January 2015. The exception of the trend of a
stronger US dollar is the Yuan that remained well in a small range between 6.10
yuan per dollar and 6.17 yuan per dollar from the first quarter of 2014 to the
first quarter of 2015.
Commodities
In the area
of commodities, the big surprise was oil. Its price had been steady over a long period of time within a range between 90 and 100 dollars per barrel when in November 2014 it
suddenly plunged to 70.2 dollar only to fall even further to 62.6 per cent in
February 2015. This gives one more signal that the commodities boom is over.
Not only oil fell in price, likewise so did corn, which receded from 457.5
cents per bushel in February 2014 to 384.5 cents per bushel in February 2015.
In the same time span, coffee fell from 179.8 cents per pound to 136.8 cents
per pound and soya from 1414.3 cents per bushel to 1030.8 cents per bushel.
Sugar fell
only slightly from 16.5 cents per pound in February 2014 to 13.9 cents per
pound in February 2015 while in the same period wheat fell from 599.0 cents per
bushel to 517.5 cents per bushel.
Despite the
turmoil on the financial markets and the overall strength of the US dollar,
golds prices did not move much. The gold price fell from 1321.6 dollars per
ounce in February 2014 to 1175.2 cents per pound in November 2014, but
recovered to 1231.1 dollars per ounce in February 2015.
Monday, January 27, 2014
Financial Markets Snapshot January 2014
Financial
Markets Snapshot January 2014
Cash
& Currencies
Economic
growth is back in the industrialized countries. In the third quarter of 2013,
the U.S. economy grew 3.3 % on an annualized basis, while Germany registered
2.8 % and Japan 2.1 %. Current estimates say that economic growth will continue
at that level or even get higher in 2014. As a remarkable feature, it has shown
up recently that the growth rates in the industrialized countries tend to
exceed those of the emerging markets. Brazil, in particular, is well below the
rate that were necessary to move this country into the group of the rich
countries. It is also worthwhile to note that economic growth has returned
irrespective of whether government and central banks pursued expansive policies
or whether there has been more austerity. This way, both the US and Japan -
where highly expansive monetary and fiscal policy were installed - register
economic growth just as Germany and the United Kingdom do, where macroeconomic
policy leaned more to austerity.
One caveat in this rosy picture,
however, comes from industrial production whose growth rate is much weaker than
that of Gross Domestic Product and still negative in the Euro Zone and the
United Kingdom. This may indicate that the driving force of economic growth is
not yet investment but rather consumption and government demand. If this is the
case, the recovery would be short-lived because it would mean that the current
economic expansion is the consequence of a temporary catching-up to foregone
consumption in the past couple of years.
Macroeconomic policy can do nothing
other than wait. There are signs that confidence is coming back. Consumer
optimism in on the rise but what counts is employment. In this respect, the
situation is still dire in many countries, even in the United States. While the
unemployment rate has fallen in the U.S., employment is still significantly below
the level before the crisis.
America’s
current account deficit is finally receding from above three percent to the
range of two the three per cent. As of now, there seems to be the possibility
that global imbalances can adjust in a smooth way so that China and other
surplus countries can reduce their trade surpluses without much disruption,
while the US continues to bring down its trade deficit. In Europe, there is the
curiosity that Germany continues to register extremely high current account
surpluses while the current account of the United Kingdom is deeply in the red.
Part of the explanation comes from international competitiveness, the other
part of the explanation are exchange rates. In the wake of the euro crisis, the
British pound served temporarily as a safe haven and at the height of the euro
crisis, even ordinary citizens moved their money out of the euro into other
currencies, among these preferably the British pound. With the panic over,
reallocation is getting in place and the outlook for Britain’s foreign trade
may be improving.
Interest rate continue at their
extremely low level. The Libor rate for the US dollar even fell slightly more
from 0.51 % to 0.35 % over the year from December 2012 to December 2013. Even
lower that the rate for the US dollar, is the LIBOR rate for the euro, which
stands at 0.21 % in December 2013. Among the major currencies, it only for the
yen that the LIBOR rate is rising. This rate stands at 0.35 % in December 2013
up from 0.26 % in June and September.
The US prime rate has remained steady at
3.25 % throughout the past year, and the Federal Funds Rate remains close to
“zero bound” in a range from 0.01 to 0.04 per cent.
In February 2014, Janet Yellen will
become the new chairperson at the American central bank. As of now, there are
no indications that the US central bank will change its stance.
The
international currency system has remained amazingly stable over the past year.
Exchange rates showed little alterations and volatility remained in check.
There has been a tiny appreciation of the euro against the US dollar from 1.33
in January to 1.36 in October 2013. As to the pound, the exchange rate has
returned to its level of October of 2012 at 1.61 when it reached the same value
in October 2013. The Japanese yen continues to weaken, yet the pace is moderate
and runs smoothly. The same holds for the Chinese Yuan, where the monetary
authorities implement a controlled appreciation, which so far has brought the Yuan/dollar
exchange rate from 6.31 in October 2012 to 6.14 in October 2013.
Among the commodities, gold has
experienced a remarkable fall over the year, plunging from 1675.6 in December
2012 to 1202.3 in December 2013. In part, this price move reflects that the
turmoil in the international financial markets has calmed down and the outlook
for either massive inflation or deflation has receded. The move out of gold may
also be consequence of expectations that no defaults of major economies are in
pipeline and that the euro zone will not blow apart.
The price of oil has been very stable
over the past year. Over the past year, only marginal fluctuations have taken
place within a range of 102.2 and 111.1 US dollar per barrel.
The trend towards lower prices of
commodities was not only visible in gold, but in almost all major commodities.
From December 2012 to December 2013, the price of corn fell from 698.3 to 422.0
cents per bushel; coffee fell from 143.8 to 110.7 cents per pound. Soya and
wheat became slightly cheaper and stand now at 1312.5 cents per bushel and
605.4 cents per bushel. Sugar continues to get cheaper as its price fell from
19.5 cents per pound to 16.4 cents per pound.
Antony P.
Mueller
The Continental
Economics Institute
Monday, October 28, 2013
Financial Market Snapshot November 2013
Financial Market Snapshot November 2013
Cash & Currencies
Economic Growth
& Prices
In the second quarter of 2013, economic growth
picked up in the major economies of the world. From the first to the second
quarter of 2013, growth rates rose from 1.3 % to 1.6 % in the United States,
from 0.1 % to 1.3 % in Japan and from 0.2 % to 1.35 % in the United Kingdom.
Germany, which had a negative growth rate of 0.3 % in the first quarter of
2013, registered a positive rate of 0.5 % in the second quarter. The Euro Zone
as a whole could reduce its negative growth rate from 1.2 % to 0.6 % and seems
to be on its way to recovery.
Despite these changes towards more economic
growth, the rates are still much too low for bringing about a return to the
growth trend of the past. The world economy suffers from a lack of dynamics.
Economic growth, which feeds on itself, is nowhere to be seen. It is
symptomatic of the situation that central banks continue with their policy of
extremely low interest rates. The US central bank announced that it will not
yet stop with its policy of monetary stimuli (“quantitative easing”) and the
European Central Bank has made its program of “outright monetary transactions”
(OMT) a regular part of its policy.
Data of industrial production show that
economic growth in the major economies of the world is not yet robust but hangs
on the lifesaver of monetary stimuli. In the United States, industrial
production has wakened in the second quarter of 2013 from 2.4 % to 1.9 %. The
rebound in the other major economies is very weak, as they remain stuck in
negative territory outside of Germany, which registered a positive rate of growth
of industrial production of 1.1 % in the second quarter of 2013. Japan is still
in negative territory albeit the rate changed from -6.2 % in the first quarter
to -2.9 % in the second quarter of 2013. For the Euro Zone as a whole, the rate
changed from -2.3 to -1.1 % from the first to the second quarter of 2013.
International
Trade, prices and interest rates
The United States continues to register a current
account deficit of 2.5 % of its gross domestic production in the second quarter
of 2013, only slightly different from the previous numbers. The same holds for
the United Kingdom whose current account also remains persistently in negative
territory, although the highly critical number of -6 % of the current account
balance to gross domestic production, which the country registered in the first
quarter of 2013, has become more tolerable at minus 3% in the second quarter of
2013. The situation also did not very much change for Germany that continues to
accumulate extremely high current account surpluses in the range of 6 % and
more. For the Euro Zone as a whole, the current account balance (in percent of
gross domestic product) remains positive and stood at 1.4 % in the first
quarter of 2013, while Japan moved back to a surplus of 1.3 % in the first
quarter of 2013.
The interest rates for the US dollar, the euro
and the yen are all still extremely low. From June 2013 to September 2013, the
6-months LIBOR rate for the US dollar fell from 0.41 % 0.37% while the rate for
the euro declined slightly from 0.23 % to 0.22% and remained steady for the Yen
at 0.26%. The U.S. central bank has furthermore brought down its policy rate
(“federal funds rate) from 0.05 % in March 2013 to 0.01 % in September 2013.
How long can this policy continue? Over the
past years, the world economy has become overly dependent on extremely low
interest rate. Yet as the decades-long example of Japan shows, these policies
of monetary and fiscal stimuli are not very effective in bringing the economy
out of the slump in a significant degree.
Exchange
rates & commodity prices
One of the most amazing features over the past
couple of years is the high stability of the euro-dollar exchange rate. Despite
all the turmoil that came with the global financial crisis since 2008, the
exchange rate of the dollar held steady at about 1.30 to the euro. More or less
the same can be said about the British pound and more recently of the Japanese
Yen and the Chinese Yuan. A large part of this stability, however, is not the
result of market forces, but due to outright currency management or ad hoc
interventions. It remains to be seen whether the trend of stable currency rates
can continue while massive changes happen at the level of the real economy
along with possible divergences in prices and debt. Part of the explanation of
a relatively stable currency system can be found in the fact that the major
economies (US, euro zone, Japan) suffer from similar ailments and pursue very
similar policy strategies. The US, Europe and Japan all suffer from high debt burdens,
low growth and pursue expansive monetary policies trying to overcome their
economic malaise. With no immediate threat showing up in the statistics for the
price level and the prices for commodities, central banks in these countries
feel encouraged of continuing their stimulus policies.
The price of gold, which some observers take as
an early indicator for inflation as it reflects current price expectations, has
maintained its lower level since it came down from 1771.1 dollars per ounce in
September 2013 to 1223.7 dollars per ounce in June 2013. The figure of 1326.5
dollars per ounce of September 2013 does not yet signal a significant return to
higher inflationary expectations. This perspective is confirmed by the price
for crude oil, which cost 108.4 dollars per barrel, not much less than a year
before when oil was quoted at 112.4 dollars per barrel. Most of the other
commodities have fallen over the past months yet with the exception of corn
only in moderate form.
Antony P. Mueller
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
Financial Market Snapshot September 2013
The Continental Economics
Institute’s Financial Market Snapshot
September 3, 2013
by Antony Mueller
Economic growth and monetary
conditions
The period of relative tranquility
on the international financial markets over the past couple of months is
ending. Major changes have already taken
place, many more are about to happen. In the United States, the American
central bank is about to end its monetary policy of quantitative easing. The
effects of this change have already led to a shift in international capital
flows. Money moves out of the emerging markets. This way not only the Brazilian
real has weakened, but devaluation also hit hard the Indian rupee. In Europe,
the announcement of its “Outright Monetary Transactions” program by the European
Central Bank (ECB) last year has tranquilized financial markets and lowered the
risk perception of international investors of the creditworthiness of the
European crisis countries. Growth is picking up in the United States and in
Japan. Over the past couple of years, the major central banks have swamped the
globe with liquidity. If economic recovery should continue, a new tough job already
awaits central bankers: how to avoid worldwide inflation.
Commodities
There are signs that the super cycle
in commodities is not yet over. There is little reason to expect the oil price
to fall. On the contrary, the tensions in the Middle East are rising. Conflicts
that are even more violent seem inevitable. This way oil and gold are set for
rebound. Other commodities will benefit when global economic recovery will
continue. There are signs that Europe is moving out of its slump and that the
United States and Japan are back on their growth paths. Latest figures of the
Brazilian gross domestic product indicate the end of the economic downturn of
this country. The Chinese hunger for natural resources is still unbroken. With these
demand factors well in place and given the immense liquidity overhang in the
financial markets, the failure by central banks to curb excessive monetary
growth can rapidly transform into a wave of price inflation.
International trade
One of the good signs over the past
couple of years has been the fact that the international economic and financial
crisis has not provoked protectionist measures. Except by some leaders of
emerging economies, there has been no threat of protectionism among the major
industrialized countries. Even in the face of persistently high trade deficits,
the United States did not bring up protectionism. Nevertheless, the global
macroeconomic constellation has remained unsustainable. It cannot go on forever
that China and other Asian emerging economies as well as countries like Brazil
and other emerging economies will continue to finance the American trade
deficit in its present dimensions. The problem with postponed necessary
adaptations is that these eventually tend to take place in vehement and
uncontrolled manner.
Outlook
The monetary policy of the past
couple of years with its extreme expansion of the monetary base comes back now
to haunt central bankers for years to come. Solid economic recovery is under
threat because the gigantic liquidity overhang threatens price stability. Much
earlier and stronger than otherwise - if there had not been a monetary expansion - central bankers
will now have to raise interest rates in order to avoid price
inflation. Soon we may hear from the policy makers that it was due to their
action that the recovery finally has come. They will assert that the threat of
price inflation is a completely different matter with no link to earlier
monetary policy. In reality, however, things are quite the opposite of what
these statements will say. Not only would economic recovery have come much earlier without central bank intervention, the return to economic growth would also not have to face the risk of price
inflation as it does now because of the excessive creation of central bank
liquidity over the past couple of years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)